Blog

Our workshops and current events

Latest news-archive

What employers need to know about working from home29-10-2020

As a result of the coronavirus, a large part of the employees has been working from home for more than six months. Now that the number of infections is increasing again, it seems that this will last for a longer period. This blog covers a number of employment law aspects of long-term work from home, such as health and safety rules, the employee’s freedom of choice with regard to working from home, the monitoring of the work by the employer and the reimbursement of (additional) costs. Finally, attention is paid to the phenomenon of ‘home working arrangement’, because we notice that many employers consider to introduce such arrangement.

The occupational health and safety rules

In the situation where an employee works form home, the rules laid down in occupational health and safety legislation apply. It is important to provide employees with a healthy workplace at home in order to reduce the risk of absenteeism. If a workplace does not comply with the occupational health and safety regulations, an employee may suffer damage as a result. In principle, the employer is liable for this. Working from home is covered by “location-independent work” in the context of occupational health and safety legislation. This is subject to an alleviated health and safety regime.

According to the occupational health and safety rules, the employer has two important obligations when it comes to working from home. Firstly, the obligation to ensure an ergonomically sound workplace and, secondly, to implement a policy in the field of psychosocial workload.

  1. The ergonomically sound workplace

The occupational health and safety obligations require an employer to ensure that his employees have an ergonomically sound workplace. This means that the employer must provide the appropriate work equipment, such as an ergonomic chair, desk and keyboard. An employer must also instruct the employee in the correct working posture ( e.g. the correct desk height and the correct adjustment of the desk chair) and the lighting of the workplace.

The obligation also applies if employees work from home, unless application of these rules cannot reasonably be required of the employer (for example, if an employee only occasionally works from home).

In order to guarantee an ergonomically sound workplace as much as possible, we advise employers to proactively advise employees on the optimal design of their home workplace. Try to provide this information simply and clearly, for example by means of a checklist. Such a checklist can be used to identify employees who do not have a suitable home workplace and which missing resources should be made available. Checking can take place by means of a visit by the employer or an occupational health and safety expert, or remotely by means of photographic or film material.

  1. Psychosocial workload

In addition to the care for a suitable workplace, employers should pursue a policy aimed at preventing (and limiting) the psychosocial workload of employees. Part of this policy is limiting the workload.

In the case of working from home, it is difficult for employers to identify whether (and when) employees are overburdened. The risk of overburdening has increased because many employees are forced to combine their work with (extra) caring responsibilities. In this context, we advise employers to maintain regular contact with their employees and to ask questions about the workload. If there are signs of excessive work pressure, the employer will have to make an effort to help the employee reduce the work pressure to an acceptable level. An employer will therefore have to be flexible in, for example, a situation where the employee is caring for small children who are unable to attend school or day-care because of  the coronavirus.

The employee’s freedom of choice

In principle, the employee is not free to choose whether or not to work from home.  This will have to be done in consultation with the employer. This does not mean that an employer can ignore the government’s or RIVM’s call for employees to work from home as much as possible. If it is necessary for an employee to appear at the workplace for the performance of the work, the employer will have to substantiate this and also take precautions to prevent contamination on the work floor. If, despite these measures, the employee refuses to appear at work, it will have to be assessed in all reasonableness whether the employee has a good reason to do so. If the employee does not have a good reason, failure to appear on the work floor may result in a refusal to work, with the sanction that no salary is paid for the time he has not worked or, in extreme cases, a summary dismissal.

The monitoring of the work

It can be difficult for an employer  to properly monitor the progress of the work of employees working from home. After all, there is no personal contact on the work floor. We advise employers to make good agreements with home working employees about what is expected of them. For example, about accessibility, the distribution of the work, the contact with colleagues and the way of reporting. The employee’s home situation can also play a role in this. In situations where schools and childcare facilities are temporarily closed due to the coronavirus, for example, it can be agreed that the employee will work partly in the evening hours and spend a few hours with the children during the day.

In addition to making agreements with the employee, an employer has the right to give instructions. If an employee does not follow such instructions, the employer can address the employee and, if necessary, apply a sanction. In this context, it is important that the agreements and/or instructions are recorded in writing.

If an employer wishes to make use of software to measure the performance of employees working from home, the intended decision must be submitted to the works council or employee representative body for approval.

In addition, a number of conditions for checking the homeworking employee may be mentioned on the basis of case law:

  • The employer must inform the employee in advance that his internet and e-mail activities can be monitored and how this is done.
  • There must be a legitimate purpose/legitimate interest and this must outweigh the interest of the employee.
  • This goal/interest cannot achieved in a less intrusive way.
  • The employer is obliged to take confidential (private) communication of the employee into account.

The cost of working from home

According to Nibud (National Institute for Budget Information), working from home costs about € 2 per day. For employees who work from home for a few months a year, the costs can easily rise to a few hundred euros. This includes the use of coffee, toilet, energy and depreciation on the furniture. Nibud advises employers and employees to discuss compensation for the extra costs they incur.

Employees cannot deduct the costs from the tax. Employers can, however, reimburse certain costs tax-free through the working expenses scheme. These costs can only be reimbursed to the employee tax-free within the free area of the working expenses scheme. The free area amounts to 1.2% of the total wage bill of the employer (over the wage bill up to € 400,000 the free area is 1.7%). For 2020, the free area for the first € 400,000 of wage bill has been increased to 3%.

Another possibility is the fixed travel allowance. If a fixed travel allowance has been agreed, it may be applied until 31 December 2020 based on the (travel) pattern on which the allowance was based. The condition is that entitlement to the fixed allowance is granted no later than 12 March 2020.

Home working arrangement

In relation to all employment law aspects of working from home described above, it may be wise to draw up a home working arrangement. This gives the employees clarity and can contribute to the fulfilment of the agreements. The home working arrangement can include which agreements apply to working from home. If the employer wishes to check the home worker, it will have to be laid down how this check takes place. In addition, rules may be drawn up on the protection of personal data that the employee has at his disposal when working from home.

In most cases, the home working arrangement will have to be submitted to the works council for approval. Such an arrangement will generally qualify as a work and rest time regulation, a regulation on working conditions, a regulation on staff assessment and/or a regulation on the protection of personal data as referred to in article 27 of the Works Councils Act.

If you have any questions about any of these topics or would like to draw up a home working arrangement, please feel free to contact us.

Liesbeth Zwitserlood

24-02-2023DUTCH WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT INTO EFFECT ON FEBRUARY 18TH, 2023: WHAT WILL CHANGE FOR EMPLOYERS?

The Dutch Whistleblower Protection Act, that replaces the former Dutch Whistleblowers Authority Act, strengthens the protection of whistleblowers and has important implications for employers. For most parts the law has even direct effect for employers with 249 employees or more. Employers with 50 to 249 employees are subject to a transition period until the17th of December 2023 to comply with the law. Therefore, employers for employers who have not updated their internal reporting procedures yet, must come into action. We have listed the most important changes for you.

Read article

09-11-2022SUPREME COURT: NOTIFICATION NOT TO RENEW TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT MUST ALWAYS BE IN WRITING

Employers are by now used to the fact that employees on fixed-term contracts must be informed in good time and in writing whether the contract will be extended or not. If an employer fails to do so or does so too late, the employee is entitled to compensation of up to one month's salary. What if the employer did give timely oral notice that the temporary employment contract will not be extended and the employee subsequently has a new job? Is the employee then still entitled to the compensation? 

Read article

11-07-2022Labor market plans government

On 5 July 2022, Minister Van Gennip (SZW) set out the government's plans for a future-proof labor market, including a (large) number of important plans in the field of employment law. These plans will be elaborated in bills at the beginning of 2023. In broad terms they are summarized in this blog.

Read article

14-01-2022What will change in 2022 in employment law?

We have listed the most important (upcoming) legislative changes for you.

Read article

11-01-2022Full transition payment for partial continuation of employment contract

In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled (in the so-called 'Kolom judgment') that an employee may be entitled to a partial transition payment in the event of partial termination of the employment contract. But what happens to the right to a transition payment if an employment contract is not officially “terminated” and the parties only implicitly make an agreement that fewer hours will be worked? This question recently has been considered by the court of Central Netherlands (judgment 30 April 2021 Central Netherlands District Court).

Read article

11-11-2021What can an employer do against statements of employees on social media?

These days, it is common for employees to make negative statements about their employer on social media or to express themselves in a way that is contrary to the nature of the employer’s business or company. Can the employer undertake anything against such negative statements? Yes, they can. Statements on social media are regularly a subject of dispute in court proceedings. Below I will briefly discuss two recent judgments where the employer had requested termination of employment as a result of statements on Facebook.

Read article

05-11-2021Dismissal due to regular sickness absence often unsuccessful

Article 7:669 paragraph 3 sub c of the Dutch Civil Code lists the grounds that an employer can submit to the UWV or the subdistrict court judge to terminate the employment contract. One of these grounds is “regularly unable to perform the stipulated work as a result of illness or defects of the employee with unacceptable consequences for the business operations…”.

On September 3, 2021, the District Court of The Hague ruled in a case in which the employer based the request to terminate the employment contract on this ground. The ruling shows why a dismissal on this ground often has no chance.

What was going on?

The employee has been working as a car technician at a car dealership with several branches in the Netherlands since 2013. He was employed at a local facility and was part of a team of five employees working in the workshop. In 2017 he had called in sick 4x (104 hours in total), in 2018 8x (173 hours in total), in 2019 23x (468 hours in total) and until July 10, 2020 13x (400 hours in total). The employer had requested an expert opinion from UWV and it followed from that opinion that UWV was of the opinion that there was frequent absenteeism and that this situation was expected to last longer than 26 weeks.

What did the court rule?

The court first establishes that there is frequent absenteeism within the meaning of article 7:669 paragraph 3 sub c BW. The follow-up question is whether this absenteeism leads to unacceptable consequences for the employer's business operations. According to the court, that is not the case. The employer had stated that customers would be dissatisfied with the workshop activities of the branch, but could not substantiate this, according to the court. In addition, the court considers that a company of a size such as that of this employer (with several branches in the region and throughout the Netherlands) can in principle be expected to take care of absenteeism company-wide. The fact that it is not possible within its organization to provide replacement from another location, because there is a large group with all kinds of different car brands and a mechanic who works for one car brand at one location is not as easy as a mechanic can work for the other. According to the court, a different car brand at a different location has not become plausible. The employer was also unable to demonstrate that there was a (serious) financial disadvantage. The court therefore rejected the request for dismissal.

Conclusion

This court decision once again makes clear that – certainly for larger employers – it will not be easy in the Netherlands to dismiss an employee on the basis of frequent absenteeism. Proof of the high level of absenteeism due to illness is often not the problem, but proof of the unacceptable consequences for the employer's business operations is often an unviable route.

If you have any questions about absenteeism and dismissal, please do not hesitate to contact one of the specialists at Van Bladel Advocaten via (+31) 030-2203111 or info@vanbladeladvocaten.nl

Read article

07-07-2021Full transition payment for partial continuation of employment contract

In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled (in the so-called 'Kolom judgment') that an employee may be entitled to a partial transition payment in the event of partial termination of the employment contract. But what happens to the right to a transition payment if an employment contract is not officially “terminated” and the parties only implicitly make an agreement that fewer hours will be worked? This question recently has been considered by the court of Central Netherlands (judgment 30 April 2021 Central Netherlands District Court).

Read article

29-10-2020Can an employer require from his employees to wear a face mask?

The Dutch government urgently advises to wear a face mask in public indoor spaces. There is no legal obligation (yet) to wear a face mask, but many employers are considering to introduce a face mask obligation into the workplace. What about from an employment law perspective?

Read article

11-08-2020Holiday and corona: what about the right to pay?

The holidays have started. What about wages when an employee goes on vacation to an area with a yellow, orange or red travel advice?

Read article

06-07-2020Does the employee have a right to working from home in connection with Covid-19?

Many companies let their employees work from home as much as possible in recent weeks in connection with the corona crisis. Employees are slowly returning to the office now that the virus seems to be under control. Companies will have to ensure that work in the office can be carried out in a safe manner and must therefore take measures to prevent the spread of the virus at work as much as possible. Suppose the employee does not like to return to the office. Can he or she refuse to go back to the office, given the applicability of Dutch employment law? In a case that was brought before the Gelderland District Court, the judge ruled on June 16, 2020 that this was not allowed.

Read article

18-05-2020Remarkable Supreme Court decision: Employers be alert to your employee's request to change employment

This so-called Victoria ruling of the Supreme Court of 21 February 2020 can have far-reaching consequences for employers who are confronted with a request from their employee to change the employment contract to work fewer hours (based on the Flexible Working Act) or another change proposal that they must reasonably accept as a good employer. Such a request can, under certain conditions, lead to a partial transition payment. Employers must be prepared for such a request to be made in termination proceedings, so that the employee will remain employed if the request is honored by a judge, even with a full dismissal ground. The Supreme Court thus strengthens the position of the employee.

Read article

08-05-2020Change NOW: application for individual operating company under conditions possible

On 1 May 2020, the next change to the NOW was announced and finalized. The group provision has been relaxed, in that operating companies can now also apply for NOW separately if the group's loss of turnover is less than 20%.

Read article

09-04-2020Amendments to the Temporary Emergency Measure Bridging for Work Retention Regulation (‘NOW’)

The NOW regulation, which was announced on March 31, has already changed in a few areas. This mainly concerns an extra test when submitting a dismissal application for business reasons during the NOW period and a change in the way in which the fine that applies is calculated. In this blog we inform you about the changes.

Read article

31-03-2020Publication details of Temporary Emergency Measure Bridging for Work Retention regulation (“NOW”)

Today, 31 March 2020, the Dutch government has published the details of the Temporary Emergency Measure Bridging for Work Retention regulation (“NOW”). The NOW aims at making it possible for employers to retain their employees as much as possible in the event of a loss of turnover of at least 20% as a result of the Corona crisis. To this end, a compensation in wage costs is provided of a maximum of 90% of the wage bill, related to the percentage of the decrease in turnover. Below the most important questions and answers are summed up.

Read article

24-03-2020Q&A for employers in times of Covid-19

Van Bladel Advocaten has received several questions in relation to the Covid-19 virus in relation to the workplace over the last weeks. We have bundled the most relevant questions in this blog. Please refer to our website regularly for updates and new developments.

Read article

18-03-2020Dutch measures with regard to labor costs related to COVID-19

The Minister of Social Affairs announced on March 17, 2020 that employers can apply for a compensation of wage costs if they expect at least a 20% loss of turnover due to the Corona crisis. This compensation scheme, the Temporary Emergency Measure Bridging for Work Retention (NOW), temporarily replaces the current reduction in working hours regulation that has expired immediately.

Although the scheme has yet to be worked out in detail - which is expected to happen within the next two weeks - the following is known:

 

Read article

10-03-2020Corona virus and employment law – an overview for Dutch employers

The so-called Corona virus (COVID-19) has also reached the Netherlands. Worldwide measures are being taken to prevent further spread of the virus. What does this mean for local employers and employees? This article answers questions about the obligation of the employer to prevent contamination, the entitlement to salary (whether or not in quarantine), privacy aspects and the Dutch subsidy arrangement on shortening of working hours (“Werktijdverkorting”).

Read article